The Moscow, Id Killing is a unique crime in that the killer used a knife, and killed multiple people at one location in a very short period of time. It is hard to think, that someone, who was not an experienced killer, could engage in such gruesomeness. Yet, somehow a college professor want-a-be who had only been in town a few months has been indicted for the murder of four college students.

When we think of someone framing the scene of the crime we normally point the finger at the police. You know, all the who done it movies work out that way. Yes, the police, in this crime, could have had an interest in Kohberger for sometime, because of his involvement in the Criminal Justice program at Washington State University. Maybe, there is more going on inside the criminal justice program than has been disclosed. However, forces beyond the police could have framed Mr. Kohberger. After all, it has been reviled that Mr. Kohberger had visited the party house several times before the killing. A house with such a party voracity that the police had threatened to shut it down.



Had Kohberger's harsh demeanor offended someone? Or was Kohberger a pawn in a game of cat and mouse between revivalist agents. Lets us not forget, the police were not called to the crime scene until almost noon time, many many hours after the downstairs roommates had woken up. A highly perplexing event. That they didn't call the police first. Instead, they called some friends. They told these friends the now deceased roommates were locked in their rooms, and they would not wake up.

Understand, this is a knife crime, and killer stabs all the victims multiple times until death. Get into the moment of the crime. The killer has to stab two people at the same time until death. Thus, the killers actions are rapid, thrusting, and violent.. It is a bloody horror scene. Are we to assume the killer, nor the knife the killer used, are not dripping with blood? of course not! we assume the killer, and the knife are saturated with blood which leaves blood evidence residue along the killers route, from room one, to room two, then out the exit door.The crime occurs on two floors on opposite sides of the house, which requires the killer to walk downstairs and though a hallway to the other side of the house. How could the killer have murdered four people, in a matter of 5 or 10 minutes, and walked through the house without leaving blood splatter evidence along the trail?

Lets reflect momentarily to the OJ Simpson knife stabbing trial. At this murder scene, blood splatter evidence is everywhere, leading from the victims.

According to the police affidavit(Exhibit A, Statement of Brett Payne) the only observation of blood splatter evidence outside the bedrooms is a latent shoe print, which was found only on the second processing of the crime scene by the ISP Forensic Team. Which means the foot print was invisible to the naked eye, because they had to use a special amino black procedure which are special chemicals that react with blood proteins. How could this be, that there are no blood drops on the floor, marking the killers route?

Therefore, this begs the question. How could the surviving roommates not see the blood evidence. Now, would a normal persons first reaction be to not call the police, but wait 5 or 6 hours after the discovery and call some friends over to discuss the unusual observations. Second, when the friends arrive, their first reaction is to not call the police. They and the surviving roommates discuss the matter for a few hours.Did they also not see blood on the hallway floors?

It begs the question. How could a killer, kill two people simultaneously, with one knife, in two separate locations in a very short amount of time, and not leave a trail of dripping blood evidence?

There is a lot going on in the house before the police arrive on the scene.The police report does not mention blood on the hallway, floors, nowhere except an obscure latent footprint? odd!

After leaving the bedrooms, are we to believe the killer took the time to lock the bedroom doors? Thus, preventing the surviving roommates and friends from opening the bedroom doors and looking inside after they became alarmed at the morning inactivity of their friends.

Where are the fingerprints? The DNA smudges found on the buckle clip from Mr. Kohberger's finger would suggest Mr. Kohbereger did not wear gloves. There was an additional glove found outside the house in the brush. The outside glove had DNA on it, but the DNA found on the glove did not match Mr. Kohberger. Therefore, we conclude. If Mr. Kohberger is the killer then he was not wearing gloves, Thus, fingerprints should have been found somewhere inside the property or on the door handles. If Mr. Kohberger is the killer, are we to believe he locked the doors and wiped the door handles before moving to his next step in the assassination. In addition, did he mop the floors and clean the bottom of his shoes?

One of the surviving roommates spotted the killer walking through the house on the night of the killing. She said the killer walked right past her and in the dark of the night she saw his bushy eye brows. By her testimony she doesn't perceive that her roommates have been murdered. So, she goes back into her room and falls asleep?

According to the police affidavit(Exhibit A, Statement of Brett Payne) sound analysis of a nearby camcorder records a barking dog at 0417 am on the night of the murders. Now, after hearing a disturbance upstairs around 0400 am and hearing her friend down the hall crying from being stabbed and a strange man with a mask on walking through the house from her crying friends room, and Miss Goncalves dog barking at 0417 am she falls asleep. Now, she doesn't call the police. Why would someone wake-up three times to open the door to see whats going on inside the house beyond their bedroom door?

DNA analysis is being used as the primary footprint of the alleged killer, who is Mr. Kohberger. However, the knife sheave DNA has not been corroborated with other forms of evidence linking Mr. Kohberger to be inside the home at the time the murder is assumed to have taken place. Two other DNA samples other than Mr. Kohbergers knife sheave have been identified, which is astonishing that only two have been found, since the home has been flagged as a college campus all come, at any hour, party house. The USMC knife Sheave being used as the cornerstone of the prosecutions argument appears to be an anomaly when compared to the additional evidence.